Positive Thinking Hurts So Good — 5 Tips for Project Success

Boy with a LemonDo you love project initiation?

I do.  It’s excit­ing!  You can imag­ine how you’ll be hoisted on your work­mates’ shoul­ders when you deliver what nobody else could — the sheer pos­si­bil­i­ties, the opportunities!

About week 3 you get a hint that your glasses are rose coloured when some­thing that was “def­i­nitely not in scope” is now “some­thing we might need”.  But you push through!  This is no time to be dis­cour­aged — imag­ine how happy your stake­hold­ers will be when you deliver this thing.

Ambi­tion is great.  Opti­mism is great.  But if you’re a Project Man­ager or a Busi­ness Ana­lyst, your job is not keep­ing stake­hold­ers happy, what­ever you may have thought until now.

This is for your own good, so lis­ten up.

Your job is to keep the client/customer/stakeholders hon­est — don’t let them throw away their own money and ruin your rep­u­ta­tion in the process.

1.  Keep an eagle eye out for gold plat­ing, and nip it in the bud. If you’re not sure about some­thing, make it a nice to have.  Set the expec­ta­tion early that require­ments are not a wish-list.  This doesn’t mean you can never deliver a gold plated prod­uct — but you need to make it clear what is optional and what is not.  If you man­age your scope and qual­ity cor­rectly, you’ll save on time and bud­get and come through with a few tasty extras for the client as a bonus.  The alter­na­tive is promis­ing the world and deliv­er­ing only a basic prod­uct — which the cus­tomer may have been happy with if you hadn’t agreed to so many ridicu­lous requests up front, for the sake of being a lit­tle too nice and a lit­tle too optimistic.

2.  Only agree to things that they agree to as well.  In writ­ing. It’s their project, not yours — the bonus is they’ll get a bet­ter result if you hold them account­able up front — you can’t deliver with­out them.  Project Spon­sors exist for a reason.

3.  Only com­mit to things that you can mea­sure - and that have agreed tar­gets includ­ing quan­ti­ties, dates, times and costs.  An implied tar­get is a mov­ing tar­get — and guess who gets to move it?  Not you.  Account­abil­ity isn’t just about who to blame.  It helps you get what you need as well, by avoid­ing argu­ments about what was or wasn’t expected.

4.  When esti­mat­ing, your gut is wrong.  Unless you have a super­hu­man track record, or a very sim­ple project, you need to come up with a rea­son­able esti­mate, add some fat, then dou­ble it.  If you know you’ll never get that approved, work back­wards, re-scoping as you go until you get to a fig­ure every­one can live with.  By the way, don’t assume that your fat esti­mate won’t be approved — often we under­es­ti­mate out of inse­cu­rity more than any real con­straints on bud­get.  Save money dur­ing deliv­ery, not while you’re esti­mat­ing and planning.

5.  Don’t ever work back from an imposed end date. If the project has to be fin­ished by a cer­tain time, that’s fine — but you still need to plan for the time you actu­ally need.  Adjust one vari­able at a time.  If the effort required will take too long, add resources.  If that doesn’t get you there, decrease scope.  Respec­ify qual­ity.  Add money.  What­ever you do, don’t kid your­self that sun­shine, rain­bows and uni­corns will make 9 months of effort fit into 6 months of project — no mat­ter how much your cus­tomer tells you it’s doable.

What traps have you fallen into on a project?  What mis­takes have you seen oth­ers make and how have you avoided them?  Let me know in the comments.

Related Posts:

4 Responses to “Positive Thinking Hurts So Good — 5 Tips for Project Success”

Read below or add a comment...

  1. Christopher says:

    James, I real­ized a long time ago that what­ever my gut tells me, I’m wrong :) That’s why I almost always say things will take twice as long as I’m guessing.

  2. James says:

    Christo­pher that’s always a good policy!

  3. Toots says:

    All traps can result from poor lead­er­ship / man­age­ment of the project. At first, when recruit­ing a project team, the indi­vid­u­als must be con­vinced that the project will work. Unclear scope, poor com­mu­ni­ca­tion, no role clar­ity, par­tial com­mit­ment from project mem­bers, stick­ing to it are a few com­mon traps. I found that project time­lines, com­ple­tion dates are rarely lucid and don’t stay on target!

    You can avoid these by review­ing project learn­ings and final­i­sa­tion reports if they’re around, and ask­ing ques­tions. Yes we must be account­able, but project mem­bers also look towards their PM to be account­able for each step they do and take to ensure the project comes out a suc­cess and not a flop!

  4. Toots says:

    All traps can result from poor lead­er­ship / man­age­ment of the project. At first, when recruit­ing a project team, the indi­vid­u­als must be con­vinced that the project will work. Unclear scope, poor com­mu­ni­ca­tion, no role clar­ity, par­tial com­mit­ment from project mem­bers, stick­ing to it are a few com­mon traps. I found that project time­lines, com­ple­tion dates are rarely lucid and don’t stay on tar­get! Hence, a crit­i­cal path is really essential.

    You can avoid these by review­ing project learn­ings and final­i­sa­tion reports if they’re around, and ask­ing ques­tions. Yes we must be account­able, but project mem­bers also look towards their PM to be account­able for each step they do and take to ensure the project comes out a suc­cess and not a flop!

Leave A Comment...

*